Why the classic structure is still established scientific standard and how the classic works
The structure of a scientific project causes problems for many students. We usually recommend a classic structure that eliminates many of the common mistakes. Benefits of the out-of-fashion classic can be seen for the students and reviewers.
For a theoretical work, the classical structure (in the form of 1. Introduction, 2. Theoretical Background, 3. Viewing the Phenomenon, 4. Analyzing the Phenomenon from the Perspective of Theory, 5. Summary) gives a consistent structuring.
This structuring allows the author to create a common thread that virtually prevents it from spontaneously breaking away from the path of virtue in the writing process. Based on the structure of the assignment of content (theory and phenomenon) in the project immediately recognizable, also the assignment of the dispute in the analysis part.
For the reviewers, the classical structure of the structure allows an overview of the central evaluation factors of the work already when looking at the table of contents. The valuation-relevant weighting of the shares shows whether typical rookie errors arose.
Very common are z. B. Imbalances at the expense of theory or at the expense of the phenomenon. Also, an excess of these two parts to the detriment of the analysis is one of the unfortunately still popular mistakes. In order not to fall into these traps during the writing process, it is recommended to first define volume proportions for the chapters.